Home › Track Record › Week of Aug 17, 2026

Week of Aug 17, 2026

Settled options ideas entered during this week, scored against the stock's actual close around expiration. Every call is here, win or loss. Open Why this call under any of them to read how it was picked and, where it was recorded, what the analysis said at the time.

Overall Win Rate
50%
2W / 2L · 4 settled calls
Bear Call Spread
50%
1W / 1L
Bull Call Spread
0%
0W / 1L
Bull Put Spread
100%
1W / 0L
Market context that week

SPY 778.40 (20-day MA 756.30, above) · QQQ 733.42 (20-day MA 704.24, above). Both indices sit above their 20-day moving average, so the macro gate is in force: a bear spread needs an explicit fundamental catalyst, and valuation alone does not qualify.

Policy in force that week

8 lessons were active that week.

ADIBull Put SpreadBullishTier 2
Strikes
$352.96 / $345.45 modeled
Entered
2026-08-18
Expiry
2026-08-21
Engine
SeerForecast
Win+$151
Why this call
What the analysis said

Forecast growth of 20.75% and a one-year miss rate of just 18% back up a consensus EPS estimate near $3.33 versus $2.05 a year ago — roughly 62% growth — on guidance of about $3.9B revenue and a 39% operating margin. Management's demand commentary centers on industrial, data-center and automotive AI-linked power and compute demand, and the pending Empower Semiconductor acquisition extends that story into power-density efficiency for AI infrastructure. The internal model itself reads this as fair-to-fully-valued (Blended P/E 33.52 against Normal P/E 20.99, forecast return essentially flat at -1.4%), which is exactly why this is written as a credit structure rather than a debit bet on further re-rating — the case here rests on the guidance and the demand cycle, not on the multiple re-rating further. The short put sits at the estimated 5.8% implied move, not beyond it.

  • Risk: China has historically been a meaningful share of ADI's end-market exposure through the industrial and automotive supply chain, and any fresh export-control headline is a step function this model cannot see. The implied-move figure traces to a single options-data aggregator; reprice both strikes off the live quote before entry, and skip if the live credit is under 12% of the $8 width.
How it was picked

From the written analysis. The weekly analysis made this call. The rule-based screen did not select this ticker and structure that week.

Policy in force that week

1 of 8 lessons active that week named this play.

  • bull-debit-call-structure-downgrade: Bullish debit structures (Bull Call Spread / Long Call) into earnings lose at a far higher rate than credit Bull Put Spreads across the entire sample, so downgrade any long-side thesis expressed as a debit call structure and prefer the put-credit expression.
JKHYBear Call SpreadBearishTier 2
Strikes
$159.24 / $165.37 modeled
Entered
2026-08-18
Expiry
2026-08-21
Engine
SeerForecast
Loss−$700
Why this call
What the analysis said

Management itself guided fiscal Q4 growth below the pace of Q1–Q3, disclosed deconversion revenue of $9.3M for the quarter ($42.8M for the full year), and flagged margin contraction against a prior-year comparison that benefited from unusually low self-insured medical claims. That is an explicit, company-sourced catalyst — not our multiple math — which is what lets a bear structure past the macro gate even though SeerAI Score is strong, the one-year miss rate is a clean 9%, and Blended P/E is actually 17% below Normal P/E. The short call sits outside the estimated near-term move.

  • Risk: EPS estimates for the quarter range from about $1.43 to $1.50 across sources — wide enough that the live number could land on either side of guidance. A name with this clean a beat/meet record is not one to press, which is why this stays at Tier 2 with a tight $6 width rather than a larger size.
How it was picked

Rule-based screen agreed. The rule-based screen selected this ticker and structure independently that week.

  • Signal class: Weak Bear
  • Valuation vs its own normal P/E: -17%
Policy in force that week

8 lessons were active that week. None applied to this play.

NXPIBull Call SpreadBullishTier 3
Strikes
$242.03 / $232.72 modeled
Entered
2026-08-17
Expiry
2026-08-28
Engine
SeerForecast
Loss−$400
Why this call
What the analysis said

Not recorded for this week.

How it was picked

From the written analysis. The weekly analysis made this call. The rule-based screen did not select this ticker and structure that week.

Policy in force that week

1 of 8 lessons active that week named this play.

  • bull-debit-call-structure-downgrade: Bullish debit structures (Bull Call Spread / Long Call) into earnings lose at a far higher rate than credit Bull Put Spreads across the entire sample, so downgrade any long-side thesis expressed as a debit call structure and prefer the put-credit expression.
UIBear Call SpreadBearishTier 3
Strikes
$618.74 / $624.47 modeled
Entered
2026-08-20
Expiry
2026-08-21
Engine
SeerForecast
Win+$90
Why this call
What the analysis said

Non-GAAP EPS growth ran above 70% year over year in each of the prior two quarters and consensus for this quarter implies roughly 3% growth — a real deceleration, not a manufactured one, and the explicit catalyst the macro gate requires rather than the multiple by itself. SeerAI's own model reads it as extreme: a Bear Score, the highest of anything on this week's calendar, on a forecast return of -60% against a still-elevated Blended P/E of 37.6. The stock has also already corrected roughly 46% from its April high, so this doesn't require the market to discover new information — only for a soft print to confirm what price is already signaling.

  • Risk: No options-implied-move figure could be found for this print, unusual for a name this size — the strikes here are estimated from the stock's own recent price-decline volatility rather than a market-quoted move. Reprice off the live options chain before entry and skip if the live credit does not clear roughly 15% of the $5 width. The one-year miss rate is 36%, above the execution-risk line, so a beat that reverses the deceleration narrative is a real possibility — which is why this sits at Tier 3 rather than Tier 2 despite the extreme model reading.
How it was picked

From the written analysis. The weekly analysis made this call. The rule-based screen did not select this ticker and structure that week.

Policy in force that week

8 lessons were active that week. None applied to this play.

Strikes appear only after a call settles, and each carries the label it earned. Modeled means reconstructed from the play’s stated sizing rules, or from the house methodology’s default offsets where the play stated none. Listed means our daily re-pricing job read the option chain that morning and picked a strike the chain actually lists, so the number names a contract that existed. Neither is a fill: we do not record fills, and no label here claims one. Older rows without enough stored detail to reconstruct show —.

This ledger shows the outcome of every options idea our SeerForecast engine has published: wins and losses alike, with none removed. Outcomes are scored mechanically against the stock's actual close around expiration. Past results do not predict future performance, and this ledger is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Each settled call's decision receipt is on its week's page: how it was picked, the policy in force, and the analysis's own reasoning where it was recorded. The current week's analysis is part of the paid product.